Smith, Paul H.

Paul H. Smith –

Paul_H_Smith_2014a_smPaul H. Smith was recruited into Star Gate remote viewing psychic espionage program in 1983. During his seven years in that program, he studied under the legendary Hal Puthoff and Ingo Swann, served as a first-line operational remote viewer, wrote the official manual on controlled remote viewing, and taught CRV to new military remote viewer candidates.  Among his students are included now-famous remote viewers such as Lyn Buchanan, Mel Riley, and David Morehouse.  Paul has briefed and demonstrated remote viewing to senators, admirals and generals, and other senior military and government officials.  He is president and chief instructor of Remote Viewing Instructional Services, Inc., and is a founding director of the non-profit International Remote Viewing Association, of which he is president.  His book “Reading the Enemy’s Mind: Inside Star Gate – ­America’s Psychic Espionage Program,” was a Book Bonus Feature and Editors Choice Selection for Readers Digest.

His latest book is “The Essential Guide to Remote Viewing: The Secret Military Remote Perception Skill Anyone Can Learn.”  Paul is also co-producer of the acclaimed DVD-based  “Learn Dowsing” training course, and the “Remote Perception: Basic Operational Training” remote viewing home-study program.  He has a BA from Brigham Young University, an MS from the National Defense University (both in Middle Eastern Studies), and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Texas at Austin, writing on consciousness, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of science.

 

 

Recent revelatory hints from Paul that he remote viewed the 2004 Tic-Tac Nimitz Encounter in 2011, likely working for Bigelow’s BAASS / AAWSAP – AATIP

“Patrick discusses shocking new information about Hal Puthoff and the 2004 “Tic-Tac” Nimitz Encounter from Psychic Spy Paul H. Smith on the Third Eye Drops podcast.”

 

BELOW… Raw YouTube Transcript:

9:20

all kinds of uh sensationalist claims and and and stories that really probably aren’t true. I I won’t go too far with

9:27

that because I don’t want to name names but uh I’d kind of tried to stay out of

9:32

it but I’ve not been able to because of well essentially the company I keep. I’m close friends with Hal Putoff and Ingle

9:39

Swan of course was very much interested in in ETSs particularly in their

9:45

abilities to engineer and manipulate consciousness. Um, and you know, John Alexander and he

9:52

and I have been buddies for forever. And you know, there’s a whole list I’m not going to go into, but I finally decided

10:00

it was time to become serious about it. Um, with the Nimmits incident, which I

10:05

had actually been exposed to in 2004, um, not sorry, not 2004, 2011.

10:13

And um and that kind of brought me around because now we have very hard to

10:19

refute evidence that these things are real. Uh that that whole NIMK thing, in

10:25

fact, I was talking to Jay Stratton about it at uh Phenomicon. Um that that one incident plus the

10:34

others that are similar to it have given us about the best evidence you could ask

10:39

for anything, much less UAPs. I mean, multiple evidence streams, multiple

10:44

independent evidence streams reporting the same phenomenon.

10:50

We don’t get better than that. And the skeptics keep trying to debunk it, but it’s clear they don’t know what the heck they’re talking about. So, so that’s how

10:58

I got into this. And uh and I I bow to Richard’s expertise in in the UAP

11:06

uh field far far more than mine. But the whole consciousness thing is how I tie

11:11

into this. Um, it’s clear that ET has

11:18

have have has much more of an entree into using consciousness than humans do.

11:24

and Engel’s belief that humans were much much uh he believed that we had latent

11:30

uh potential that was far greater than what the ETSs have and they’re afraid of

11:35

us realizing that and so they’re intervening. Now I I I keep you I take all this stuff with a grain of salt

11:41

until we have actually evidence for it. I take it as a a hypothesis to be uh to

11:47

be established. But anyway, so so that that kind of opens the door for Richard

11:53

here who is much more the expert in this than I am. So absolutely. Quick followup, just

11:58

curiosity question. How did that come across your your your plate in 2011? Did

12:04

someone from the inside want to see what you thought about it or I was I ended um I was hired to put

12:13

together a team of people to remote view that incident. Wow. through, as you can imagine, what

12:18

was going on at the time. I have this NDA uh and I’m not sure what I can say.

12:23

Everybody else seems able to talk about it, but I I apparently can’t. Can we ask if this was part of the OAP

12:30

or ATIP programs? Oh, you know, it might have been

12:37

very very high likelihood that it might have been, right? Um

12:43

yeah, makes sense. I mean, you’ve got people like Hal Putoff involved in that in Oh, yes. He he was our

12:48

Why would they not want He was our go-between, right? Um we

12:53

didn’t do a very good job for reasons I’ve since think I teased out. Uh you

12:59

know, unlike some of my other buddies, I won’t claim to have had great success when I didn’t have great success, right?

13:06

Uh but it was a a marvelous effort. Uh we had a a building dedicated to our

13:11

particular use. We created three gray remote viewing rooms like we used to have at Fort me. Um I had uh three

13:19

monitors and six viewers and two analysts and a and a uh administrative

13:26

assistant and it was a full-fledged project for a full week and I I wish

13:32

we’d had better success. Uh but but still even just the very experience of

13:37

it and the and the practice at doing a good operation was uh was awesome. It was awesome.

13:46

That’s might be new information. Yeah. Yeah. I I think one one day we’re going to want to pry the uh results out of you if

13:53

that’s ever going to be I don’t have them actually. Oh, okay. We were required to turn

13:58

everything over to the contractor uh contracting

14:03

that’s fascinating agency shall we say. Um, and so I only

14:09

have vague memories of what came out, but it it really wasn’t very well didn’t it really didn’t produce a lot of good

14:15

information about that in incident. And I didn’t even know what the target was

14:20

until later how under the table uh informed me about it.

14:27

Still the beans. Interesting. Yeah, it’s extremely interesting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Files:

My first interview with Paul Smith circa 2002 for Austin Para Times – am working on scanning this with OCR software so I can have a searchable text transcript.

The Anomaly Archives’ March 2005 lecture featuring Paul Smith

Reading The Enemy’s Mind – March 8th, 2005 – by Former Military Remote Viewer Paul Smith.
http://www.anomalyarchives.org/oldevents/050308paulsmithrv.html

My PsiOp-Radio interview with Paul Smith (and co-host Mack White) circa 2010
01/10/2010 Sunday – Paul H. Smith on remote viewing.

PsiOp Radio 101 – 100110 with guest Paul Smith
http://www.psiopradio.com/2010/01/psiop-radio-101-100110-with-guest-paul-smith/

PsiOp Radio podcast 101 – 100110 – Guest Paul Smith
http://www.psiopradio.com/2010/01/psiop-radio-podcast-101-100110-guest-paul-smith/